Can my hon. Friend explain the logic of why amendment 31 will take away the Government’s power to amend the provision requiring a gift aid payment in a previous year, yet amendment 30, which we will come to later, will give them the power not to require any matching gift aid amount in the next year? The impact will be that a charity can make a claim without having any gift aid claims in the current year, but will have to have claimed at least a pound in the previous year. Is it not slightly perverse to table amendments with those two opposite intentions?
Small Charitable Donations Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Nigel Mills
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 26 November 2012.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Small Charitable Donations Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
554 c91 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-11-26 10:32:32 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-11-26/12112627000151
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-11-26/12112627000151
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-11-26/12112627000151