I want to challenge the hon. Lady again on these figures. I did not dispute, in my speech, the 16% figure, and I do not believe anyone else has done. That is the figure agreed by all the scientists. I want her to confirm that that 16% is the net overall figure, and that if we could reduce or even eliminate perturbation, the net figure is bound to be much higher than that. That is part of the objective in the design of these pilots.
Badger Cull
Proceeding contribution from
James Paice
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 25 October 2012.
It occurred during Backbench debate
and
e-petition debate on Badger Cull.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
551 c1172 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-11-26 10:09:42 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-10-25/12102536000074
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-10-25/12102536000074
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-10-25/12102536000074