UK Parliament / Open data

Defamation Bill

Proceeding contribution from Peter Bottomley (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 12 September 2012. It occurred during Debate on bills on Defamation Bill.

I am grateful to the hon. Member for Stoke-on-Trent South (Robert Flello) for raising this subject. His amendment refers to there being

“a prima facia case that the statement complained of is defamatory”.

I think that is right. People ought to ask themselves whether there is a reasonable probability that the claim will be successful. In criminal cases, people are not brought to court unless there is a 50:50 chance or more of conviction.

We need to go further than the prima facia case, however. The court ought to hold that there is defamation, that it is actionable and that it is likely that a court case would end in success for the claimant. Too many cases are brought that will clearly not be successful when they come to a full hearing. That applies not only to booksellers—the category this amendment specifically addresses—but all the other types of case about which I have been concerned.

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
550 c362 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top