I read the impact statement and the detailed IFS discussion of the so-called “uncertainty”. Its premise was that the avoidance would end because people would pay themselves out, regardless of how they had parked and deferred the revenue, and would therefore pay the tax at 50p. The problem is that people who have a personal service company—as so many Labour MPs and Labour supporters, including Ken Livingstone, seem to have—can defer for a very long time. They can pay themselves a beneficial loan and almost avoid tax altogether. That has also been a scandal in recent days. It is therefore not true to say people cannot continue deferring.
Finance Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Charlie Elphicke
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 2 July 2012.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Finance Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
547 c653 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-11-28 15:12:06 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-07-02/12070246000033
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-07-02/12070246000033
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-07-02/12070246000033