UK Parliament / Open data

Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome

Written question asked by Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench) on Wednesday, 25 May 2016, in the House of Lords. It was due for an answer on Friday, 3 June 2016. It was answered by Lord Prior of Brampton (Conservative) on Wednesday, 25 May 2016 on behalf of the Department of Health.

Question

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Prior of Brampton on 10 May (HL7949), what factors are thought to be responsible for differences in the number of serious adverse incidents of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) between each of the three years from 2010 to 2012 compared to 2013 and 2014; and whether the reference to professional standards applies only to clinicians or also to the activities of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority in attempting to mitigate the risks of OHSS.

Answer

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) has advised that whilst certain factors may increase the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), there is no agreed method to predict the amount of severe OHSS that will occur. Therefore, the Authority cannot infer what factors, if any, would cause year to year variation in the number of incidents reported.

Professional clinical standards are set by the appropriate Royal Colleges and issued to guide clinicians and health professionals directly, not the HFEA.

Type
Written question
Reference
HL152
Session
2016-17
Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
Tuesday, 10 May 2016
Written questions
House of Lords
Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
Wednesday, 8 June 2016
Written questions
House of Lords
Back to top