Non-Domestic Rating (Deferred Payments) (England) Regulations 2009 (SI 2009/1597). Lords debate on a motion of regret. Agreed to on division (72 votes to 66).
Non-Domestic Rating (Deferred Payments) (England) Regulations 2009
Debates on delegated legislation on Wednesday, 14 October 2009,
in the House of Lords,
led by Lord Bates.
The answering
member was Lord McKenzie of Luton.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
713 c283-300
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Non-Domestic Rating (Deferred Payments) (England) Regulations 2009
Monday, 6 July 2009
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
Monday, 6 July 2009
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
Proceeding contributions
Lord Greaves | 713 c290-1 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, as noble Lords on the Conservative Benches have said, this is not the first time the House...
Earl Attlee | 713 c289-90 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I support the Motion of regret of my noble friend Lord Bates. He reminded your Lordships t...
Show all contributions (16)
Lord Bates | 713 c284-9 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, this is not the first time that the case of backdating taxes on port-side operators has be...
Lord Bates | 713 c283 (Link to this contribution)
To resolve that this House regrets that the Non-Domestic Rating (Deferred Payments) (England) Regula...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 713 c292-4 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, my script starts with the words, "I am grateful for the opportunity to debate this importa...
Earl Attlee | 713 c294 (Link to this contribution)
Is the Minister saying that my argument was incorrect?
Earl Cathcart | 713 c291-2 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, sadly, this subject comes before your House yet again, and quite rightly too. The Governme...
Baroness James of Holland Park | 713 c292 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, retrospective taxation is unfair, unjust and immoral. It is also scandalous that any Gover...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 713 c294 (Link to this contribution)
I am not sure which of his arguments the noble Earl is referring to.
Earl Attlee | 713 c294 (Link to this contribution)
I was making the point that an ordinary business knows that it will have to pay rates on its premise...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 713 c295-6 (Link to this contribution)
I think that we received a copy of the opinion to which the noble Lord referred, and I have a note o...
Lord Bates | 713 c295 (Link to this contribution)
Will be the Minister be absolutely clear on that point? Is he saying that at the moment the view of ...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 713 c296-9 (Link to this contribution)
This is a fundamental point, which is why I disagree with the noble Lord. There was a change in the ...
Lord Greaves | 713 c296 (Link to this contribution)
The Minister is going very heavily on the fact that backdated revaluations happen quite frequently i...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 713 c294-5 (Link to this contribution)
I do not accept that position. That is part of the confusion around this. There was a change from th...
Lord Bates | 713 c299 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, the Minister has made an attempt at a defence, but it goes nowhere near the real defence t...
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-11 09:30:21 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_80098
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_80098
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_80098