UK Parliament / Open data

Business Rate Supplements Bill

Debate on bills on Monday, 29 June 2009, in the House of Lords.
Business Rate Supplements Bill. Commons amendment and reasons considered. Lords amendments 1 to 6, 13 and 14 not insisted on, and Commons amendment in lieu agreed to. Lords amendments 11 and 12 not insisted on.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
712 c10-34 
Session
2008-09
Legislative stage
Lords amendments and Commons amendments
Procedure
Commons reasons
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Proceeding contributions
Lord Jenkin of Roding | 712 c32 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, is the noble Lord saying that there has been no change to the Cabinet Office guidance beca...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 712 c32-3 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I was going to go on to say about the guidance that I am not aware that particular changes...

Show all contributions (21)
Lord Bates | 712 c33 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, is that an undertaking from the government Bench—given that the noble Lord, Lord Mandelson...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 712 c34 (Link to this contribution) No, my Lords, the noble Lord cannot take that from what I said. I said that I would bring it to the ...
Lord Patten | 712 c31 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I agree with everything that my noble friend Lord Cathcart has just said, except in one ve...
Earl Cathcart | 712 c30-1 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I should declare an interest as an accountant and as a director of businesses paying busin...
Lord Howarth of Newport | 712 c29 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I look forward to hearing the Minister’s reply. I add my plea that he and my noble friend ...
Lord Jenkin of Roding | 712 c26-9 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, my noble friend has made an extremely powerful speech on the merits of the issue we are di...
Lord Bates | 712 c22-6 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I cannot welcome that statement from the Minister. I appreciate that he is reading the adv...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 712 c21-2 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, Amendments 11 and 12 were the subject of a comprehensive debate in this House on Report. T...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 712 c21 (Link to this contribution) Motion B That this House do not insist on its Amendments 11 and 12 to which the Commons have disagr...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 712 c32 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, two issues arise in respect of these amendments. One is financial privilege and the other ...
Lord Tope | 712 c13 (Link to this contribution) Amendment to the Motion Leave out from "House" to end and insert "do insist on its Amendments 1, 2,...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 712 c11-3 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am of course aware that the amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Tope, would reintroduce th...
Lord Bates | 712 c15-6 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I, too, thank the Minister for his helpful introduction of Motion A standing in his name. ...
Lord Tope | 712 c13-5 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, in moving Motion A1, I thank the Minister for his full and careful explanation, to which w...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 712 c10-1 (Link to this contribution) Motion A That this House do not insist on its Amendments 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 13 and 14 and do agree w...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 712 c17-8 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I would hope—not with great prospect, I am bound to say—that I could persuade noble Lords ...
Baroness Valentine | 712 c17 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I support Amendment A1. I remain in favour of the principle of the Bill—to provide a mecha...
Lord Tope | 712 c19 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I thank the Minister for his attempts to move me, at least. I remember with nostalgia the ...
Lord Tope | 712 c31-2 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I associate the Liberal Democrat Benches with pretty well all that has been said thus far ...
Back to top