UK Parliament / Open data

Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Bill

Debate on bills and Committee proceeding on Wednesday, 21 March 2007, in the House of Lords.
Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Bill. Lords Committee stage second day. Clauses 15 to 52 agreed to. Schedules 3 to 7 agreed to. Bill reported without amendments. Grand Committee held in the Moses Room.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
690 c199-244GC 
Session
2006-07
Legislative stage
Committee stage
Procedure
New clauses
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Proceeding contributions
Lord Tordoff | 690 c210GC (Link to this contribution) I should point out to the Committee that if Amendment No. 33 were agreed to I should not be able to ...
Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 690 c205-6GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 25: 25: Clause 15, page 13, line 40, leave out from beginning to end of line 2...

Show all contributions (58)
Lord Rooker | 690 c240-2GC (Link to this contribution) I probably will not be able to answer all the points put by the noble Lord, Lord Trimble, but I have...
Lord Rooker | 690 c239-40GC (Link to this contribution) I am most grateful for the contributions, and to the noble Lord for raising the issue. I was present...
Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 690 c238GC (Link to this contribution) I had not intended to speak on this issue until I heard the noble Lord, Lord Trimble. He referred to...
Baroness Harris of Richmond | 690 c234GC (Link to this contribution) I am most grateful for the Minister’s very clear explanation. Of course, it is absolutely right that...
Lord Glentoran | 690 c233GC (Link to this contribution) The restriction to which the amendment relates is not one that we should like to see in perpetuity. ...
Lord Rooker | 690 c231-2GC (Link to this contribution) Before I respond, perhaps I may point something out. I know that the noble Lord, Lord Lester, will h...
Lord Glentoran | 690 c231GC (Link to this contribution) I have a very similar amendment, although it looks rather neater and shorter than the amendment move...
Lord Rooker | 690 c228-9GC (Link to this contribution) On the noble Lord’s final point, there is some time between now and the final stages of the Bill—aft...
Lord Trimble | 690 c230GC (Link to this contribution) Before the noble Lord sits down, I draw to his attention to the fact that, while it is certainly tru...
Baroness Harris of Richmond | 690 c230-1GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 46: 46: After Clause 39, insert the following new Clause— ““Duration of sectio...
Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 690 c225-6GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 38: 38: Clause 22, page 17, line 1, after ““A”” insert ““member of Her Majesty...
Lord Rooker | 690 c224-5GC (Link to this contribution) If the noble Lord will allow me, this is probably repeating something that I said earlier. In some w...
Lord Rooker | 690 c211GC (Link to this contribution) I say in the politest way possible that the noble Baroness, Lady Richmond, ought to think of the fee...
Lord Trimble | 690 c214GC (Link to this contribution) I support the points made by the noble Lord, Lord Lester. Surely, it should be possible to draft an ...
Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 690 c215-6GC (Link to this contribution) Unlike the Minister, I have tried to use the Freedom of Information Act and he may not realise that ...
Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 690 c203-4GC (Link to this contribution) I am very grateful to the Minister for that full reply. It is correct to say that a fetter is being ...
Lord Glentoran | 690 c210GC (Link to this contribution) My amendment, Amendment No. 34, is in this group and attempts to achieve something quite similar. Th...
Lord Glentoran | 690 c201GC (Link to this contribution) On a point not directly to do with this Bill, we have all at different times complained about the gr...
Baroness Harris of Richmond | 690 c201-2GC (Link to this contribution) I am speaking to Amendment No. 30, which stands in my name and that of my noble friend Lord Smith of...
Lord Rooker | 690 c202-3GC (Link to this contribution) I start by fully accepting the reasons for the absence of the noble Lord, Lord Lester of Herne Hill,...
Lord Trimble | 690 c240GC (Link to this contribution) Correct me if I am wrong, but I think that the engagement of the police can be knocked out if the of...
Baroness Harris of Richmond | 690 c232GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for that response. It seems that we will have to satisfy ourselves that parliam...
Baroness Paisley of St George's | 690 c238-9GC (Link to this contribution) I agree with what has been said about the community restorative justice schemes in republican areas,...
Lord Trimble | 690 c234-7GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 50: 50: After Clause 47 , insert the following new Clause— ““Community restora...
Lord Rooker | 690 c233-4GC (Link to this contribution) I remember dealing with this, or referring to it on Second Reading. I emphasisethis point, so that t...
Baroness Harris of Richmond | 690 c232-3GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 48: 48: Schedule 5, page 44, leave out lines 39 and 40 The noble Baroness sai...
Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 690 c226-7GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful. We will obviously need to reflect on that answer. In the mean time, I beg leave to wi...
Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 690 c229GC (Link to this contribution) Since this is the last amendment with which I will be troubling the Committee, I would like to say a...
Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 690 c230GC (Link to this contribution) I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 44 and 45 ...
Lord Rooker | 690 c226GC (Link to this contribution) As the noble Lord said, the thrust of the amendment is to extend the written authorisation procedure...
Lord Rooker | 690 c218-9GC (Link to this contribution) Listening with care to the noble Lord, Lord Lester, I realise that the heading ofClause 20 ““Stop an...
Lord Rooker | 690 c222-3GC (Link to this contribution) In looking at both the amendment and the clause, I ask noble Lords to look at the power within the c...
Lord Glentoran | 690 c222GC (Link to this contribution) Having listened to the noble Lord, Lord Lester, I am no lawyer and can be outgunned from every direc...
Lord Rooker | 690 c211-2GC (Link to this contribution) I gathered the noble Baroness was reading from a document pre-dating the Government’s changes. In ot...
Lord Rooker | 690 c214-5GC (Link to this contribution) I have lost a bet I made with myself because I thought the words ““police ombudsman”” would be utter...
Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 690 c216-7GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 35: 35: Clause 20, page 16, line 6, at end insert ““reasonably”” The noble Lo...
Lord Tordoff | 690 c205GC (Link to this contribution) In calling Amendment No. 25, in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Lester, I point out that, were it t...
Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 690 c204-5GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful. I hope that the commission will carefully read what the Minister has said, and reflec...
Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 690 c208-9GC (Link to this contribution) First, I thank the Minister and wish to say that I made a mistake, for which I apologise. He is perf...
Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 690 c209-10GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 31: 31: Clause 19 , page 15, line 25, leave out ““and”” and insert ““or”” The...
Lord Rooker | 690 c207-8GC (Link to this contribution) I take what the noble Lord, Lord Lester, said at the start of his speech regarding the fact that he ...
Lord Tordoff | 690 c199GC (Link to this contribution) I start, as usual, by saying that if there is a Division in the Chamber while we are sitting, this C...
Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 690 c199-201GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 24: 24: Clause 15 , page 13, line 17, leave out ““means”” and insert ““include...
Lord Trimble | 690 c242-4GC (Link to this contribution) Towards the end of his comments, the Minister said that there will be no no-go areas and no vigilant...
Lord Glentoran | 690 c237-8GC (Link to this contribution) I support the noble Lord’s remarks and the amendment, understanding his reasoning behind it. Those ...
Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 690 c227-8GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 43: 43: Schedule 3, page 37, line 29, leave out ““four”” and insert ““two”” T...
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton | 690 c230GC (Link to this contribution) The other benefit of your Lordships’ House, including in Grand Committee, is that we are self-regula...
Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 690 c225GC (Link to this contribution) One wants to avoid the situation described in an American short story where a father is driving his ...
Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 690 c220-2GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 36: 36: Clause 21, page 16, line 27, leave out from first ““he”” to end of lin...
Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 690 c219-20GC (Link to this contribution) I am very grateful to the Minister. I would like to discuss this further with my colleagues on the J...
Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 690 c223-4GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister. A surprising and extraordinary fact about me is that I served in nati...
Baroness Harris of Richmond | 690 c211GC (Link to this contribution) I was referring to the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission report at that time.
Lord Lester of Herne Hill | 690 c213-4GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister. The reason that I shook my head was not because I thought the Freedom...
Baroness Harris of Richmond | 690 c210-1GC (Link to this contribution) I shall speak to Clause 19 stand part. The Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission said that Claus...
Lord Rooker | 690 c204GC (Link to this contribution) Committee stage is an opportunity to consider everything that is said but, to the best of my knowled...
Baroness Harris of Richmond | 690 c206-7GC (Link to this contribution) I rise to speak to the Amendments Nos. 27 and 29 in my name and that of my noble friend. The Norther...
Back to top