UK Parliament / Open data

Legal Services Bill [HL]

Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bills on Tuesday, 9 January 2007, in the House of Lords.
Legal Services Bill (HL). Lords Committee stage, first day. Clauses 1 and 2 agreed to. Schedule 1 as amended agreed to. Clause 3 under consideration.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
688 c116-79 
Session
2006-07
Legislative stage
Committee stage
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Proceeding contributions
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c156 (Link to this contribution) If the noble and learned Lord the Lord Chief Justice were consulted about a person and he said, ““No...
Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 688 c160 (Link to this contribution) I just want this clarified a little further. In saying that she does not intend to consider this ame...

Show all contributions (148)
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c159-60 (Link to this contribution) I will certainly consider how we might address any further concerns about independence. Whether that...
Lord Wedderburn of Charlton | 688 c159 (Link to this contribution) Can I just get clear what the noble Baroness is saying? For all the distance between us, I put the q...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c159 (Link to this contribution) May I finish my point? Also, there is a perception, wrong though it may be, about the Lord Chief Jus...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c158-9 (Link to this contribution) My noble and learned friend was indicating the views of consumer organisations and groups and not hi...
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c158 (Link to this contribution) I am disappointed to hear what the Minister has just said, as will be all the members of the Joint C...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c156-8 (Link to this contribution) This has been a debate of great passion and I will think very carefully about all that has been said...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c160 (Link to this contribution) The Government’s position is that we set our face against the involvement of the Lord Chief Justice ...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c160 (Link to this contribution) Yes indeed, and the noble Lord’s position is absolutely clear. I was indicating that the principle t...
Lord Neill of Bladen | 688 c160 (Link to this contribution) Can the Minister clarify what she has just now said twice, about independence not being on the face ...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c163 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister. I am certainly not going to reject the offer of an affirmative resolu...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c162-3 (Link to this contribution) I thank the noble Lord for that opportunity. It will not surprise him to hear that I do not want to ...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c164-5 (Link to this contribution) I have already, to some extent, spoken to the substance of this amendment, when I indicated the dang...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c163-4 (Link to this contribution) moved AmendmentNo. 9: 9: Schedule 1 , page 112, line 12, leave out ““Secretary of State”” and inse...
Baroness Turner of Camden | 688 c162 (Link to this contribution) I remind noble Lords that if Amendment No. 8 is agreed to, I cannot call Amendment No. 9 because of ...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c160-1 (Link to this contribution) I had almost forgotten that I introduced this amendment, there having been so many eloquent speeches...
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c162 (Link to this contribution) I strongly support my noble friend. We were treated to a very helpful report from the Delegated Powe...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c162 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 8: 8: Schedule 1 , page 112, line 12, leave out sub-paragraph (3) The noble ...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c166-7 (Link to this contribution) I have listened with great interest not only to the comments that have been made in the debate on th...
Lord Lyell of Markyate | 688 c166 (Link to this contribution) The noble Baroness has already very kindly said that she will explain the difference between the use...
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c165-6 (Link to this contribution) So do I. I also strongly support the words of my noble friend. I know that we have debated this alre...
Lord Lofthouse of Pontefract | 688 c167 (Link to this contribution) had given notice of his intention to move Amendment No. 13A: 13A: Schedule 1 , page 112, line 17, ...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c167 (Link to this contribution) moved AmendmentNo. 11: 11: Schedule 1 , page 112, line 15, leave out ““Secretary of State”” and in...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c167 (Link to this contribution) The explanation that I gave was that, in the concordats with the Constitutional Reform Act, decision...
Lord Lyell of Markyate | 688 c167 (Link to this contribution) The noble Baroness was going to explain the difference between the Lord Chancellor and the Secretary...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c168 (Link to this contribution) I need to clarify this so I am clear that it is not me who is getting this wrong. The Bill says that...
Lord Lofthouse of Pontefract | 688 c168 (Link to this contribution) I am saying that he should not be a lawyer. I am not saying that because I have fallen out with some...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c168 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 14: 14: Schedule 1 , page 112, line 26, leave out ““never been”” and insert ““...
Lord Lofthouse of Pontefract | 688 c168 (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister very much for that assurance. [Amendment No. 13A not moved.]
Lord Swinfen | 688 c169 (Link to this contribution) I hesitate to intervene in this debate. I do so only because I was rather disappointed that the nobl...
Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 688 c168-9 (Link to this contribution) I support this amendment. I have to confess that I feel a very subjective involvement in its terms s...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c169-70 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for the contribution of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Lyell, on this issue. Indeed,...
Lord Lyell of Markyate | 688 c169 (Link to this contribution) I see this really as a probing amendment, giving the Minister an opportunity for reflection. I can s...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c170 (Link to this contribution) moved AmendmentNo. 17: 17: Schedule 1, page 113, line 17, leave out ““Secretary of State”” and ins...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c170 (Link to this contribution) I am most grateful to the noble Baroness. I think she has said enough to give me hope that on Report...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c171 (Link to this contribution) We on these Benches support the amendment. I hope that the Minister will at least give an assurance ...
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c170-1 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 19: 19: Schedule 1, page 113, line 17, at end insert ““secure that persons are...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c174 (Link to this contribution) My name is attached to this amendment and, of course, we support it from these Benches. It provides ...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c173-4 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 31: 31: Clause 3 , page 2, line 24, at end insert— ““( ) The Board must, so fa...
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c173 (Link to this contribution) I am very grateful to the Minister for giving us a different dimension which I confess I had not rea...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c173 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendments Nos. 20 to 23: 20: Schedule 1 , page 114, line 5, leave out ““Secretary of State”...
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c173 (Link to this contribution) I was anxious not to interrupt the Minister because I felt the more she spoke, the more she would co...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c173 (Link to this contribution) They are not departing from it, not because of this piece of legislation but because of custom and p...
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c172 (Link to this contribution) I am slightly bemused because I heard the noble Baroness say that we should not put in the Bill some...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c172 (Link to this contribution) There is an issue which I did not mention but have been thinking about. I talked about the principle...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c171-2 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for the explanation of what noble Lords are seeking to achieve. I agree that the princ...
Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 688 c177 (Link to this contribution) We on these Benches agree with the argument put forward by the noble Lord, Lord Kingsland. In our ju...
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c177-8 (Link to this contribution) I suppose that in this amendment we seek not to lose the ground that we have gained. We have now per...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c178 (Link to this contribution) I should be delighted to do that. The noble Lord, Lord Kingsland, and I had a brief conversation abo...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c179 (Link to this contribution) I am most grateful for the Minister’s response. I accept that there may be difficulties with my craf...
Lord Neill of Bladen | 688 c175-6 (Link to this contribution) At Second Reading, I said that it would be a nice idea to get the concept of ““light touch”” into th...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c176 (Link to this contribution) I was reading some of the comments of my honourable friend Bridget Prentice when she appeared before...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c176 (Link to this contribution) I am most grateful to the Minister. I believe she has fully understood the point that we have tried ...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c177 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 32: 32: Clause 3 , page 2, line 25, leave out ““, so far as is reasonably prac...
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c174-5 (Link to this contribution) I strongly agree with both my noble friend and the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford. We spent som...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c179 (Link to this contribution) I am less persuaded than usual by the Minister. However, she knows that I am not going to press the ...
Lord Evans of Temple Guiting | 688 c179 (Link to this contribution) I beg to move that the House do now resume. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to.
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c179 (Link to this contribution) That is the difference. We do not think we have entitled the board to ignore them. We have already s...
Lord Bach | 688 c156 (Link to this contribution) I have listened with great interest to what the noble Lord has had to say on this amendment. However...
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c154-6 (Link to this contribution) If I can just finish the sentence. I prefer that the Lord Chief Justice should have to give his impr...
Lord Wedderburn of Charlton | 688 c151-2 (Link to this contribution) I wish to make a small point, without any notes. It may be thought that these arguments are advanced...
Baroness Carnegy of Lour | 688 c152-3 (Link to this contribution) I see sitting in the Chamber no fewer than five noble and learned Lords from Scotland, so I hesitate...
Lord Neill of Bladen | 688 c149-51 (Link to this contribution) My name is also on this amendment and it is correct that its language was my suggestion. I communica...
Lord Lloyd of Berwick | 688 c151 (Link to this contribution) I support the amendment. I agree with what the noble Lord, Lord Neill of Bladen, has just said, in p...
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c154 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Bach, for reminding us of, I think, the only division that we ...
Lord Bach | 688 c154 (Link to this contribution) With the approval of the Lord Chief Justice.
Lord Lyell of Markyate | 688 c153 (Link to this contribution) I strongly support almost everything that has been said. I am sure that it is right that the concurr...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c141 (Link to this contribution) Like the noble and learned Lord, Lord Lloyd, while applauding Amendments Nos. 10, 13, 15 and 16, my ...
Lord Lyell of Markyate | 688 c141 (Link to this contribution) I am most grateful to my noble friend. He was focusing, as I understand it, on the words of the Cons...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c141-2 (Link to this contribution) Of course I agree with my noble and learned friend that every Minister is bound to uphold the rule o...
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c142 (Link to this contribution) Would the noble Baroness like to rephrase that sentence?
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c142 (Link to this contribution) I probably need your Lordships’ help. We have strayed into debating three groups of amendments. It w...
Lord Lyell of Markyate | 688 c144 (Link to this contribution) I do not know whether it is in order for me to speak briefly. I want to make a point that I do not w...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c142-4 (Link to this contribution) Probably, but I will not try—the noble Lord can do it for me. The noble and learned Lord, Lord Lyel...
Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 688 c146-7 (Link to this contribution) I welcome this exchange, which is beginning to focus on some of the questions that have caused conce...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c147 (Link to this contribution) It has perhaps escaped the Government that there is a conflict with the Government themselves in so ...
Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 688 c145-6 (Link to this contribution) I confess that I find the Minister's reply on this amendment somewhat disappointing. Although she ha...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c146 (Link to this contribution) I am sorry to disappoint the noble Lord. I shall try to help him understand the direction in which I...
Lord Wedderburn of Charlton | 688 c145 (Link to this contribution) I have a small point but it may be important in relation to the amendments to come. When the Ministe...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c145 (Link to this contribution) The role of Her Majesty in determining appointments varies. I would not wish to suggest that Her Maj...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c144-5 (Link to this contribution) I completely respect and accept what the noble and learned Lord says about the importance of the leg...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c148-9 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 5: 5: Schedule 1, page 112, line 6, at end insert ““with the concurrence of th...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c148 (Link to this contribution) This has been illustrated all over the world, perhaps critically in South Africa in the days of apar...
Lord Wedderburn of Charlton | 688 c147-8 (Link to this contribution) Does the noble Lord agree that there is experience on the Continent, not least as the Weimar Republi...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c136-7 (Link to this contribution) moved AmendmentNo. 4: 4: Schedule 1 , page 112, line 6, leave out ““the Secretary of State”” and i...
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c137 (Link to this contribution) I always find it very difficult to understand why the Government decided to abolish the post of the ...
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c137 (Link to this contribution) That was the position on12 June 2003, but on 11 June 2003 we had a press release from No. 10 Downing...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c138 (Link to this contribution) I do not recognise ““rotund”” in relation to my noble and learned friend.
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c137-8 (Link to this contribution) That was a very helpful steer as to the comparative powers of the Prime Minister and the Government....
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c138 (Link to this contribution) I beg the noble Lord’s pardon, as I should not heckle—but he is so easily pushed.
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c138 (Link to this contribution) May I answer that comment by saying that I now look forward to the intervention of the noble Lord?
Lord Lyell of Markyate | 688 c139-40 (Link to this contribution) I support the amendment, at least as a very careful probing amendment. There seems to be a great dea...
Lord Lloyd of Berwick | 688 c140 (Link to this contribution) First, I apologise for missing the first few moments of the speech of the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of...
Lord Wedderburn of Charlton | 688 c138 (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord may be aware that there have been moves, under a sort of freedom information parallel...
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c138-9 (Link to this contribution) This is a wonderful opportunity for us all to say that we look forward to the moment when that envel...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c140 (Link to this contribution) I think, as a Front-Bench spokesman for the Opposition, I am required by convention to speak before ...
Baroness Carnegy of Lour | 688 c140 (Link to this contribution) I hesitate to intervene, but perhaps my noble friend should wait until we have had the Government’s ...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c140 (Link to this contribution) I am most grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Thomas, for the amendments that he tabled. In some respec...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c140 (Link to this contribution) The noble Baroness was badly advised in that instance.
Lord Lyell of Markyate | 688 c130 (Link to this contribution) Instead of promoting competition and the provision of services as one of the regulatory objectives, ...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c130 (Link to this contribution) I am always delighted to broaden things out. One of the advantages of Committee is that it enables u...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c128-9 (Link to this contribution) That was speedier than I thought. I understand entirely what the noble Lord, Lord Kingsland, is get...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c129-30 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Baroness for her reply. We do not dispute the desirability of having comp...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c127-8 (Link to this contribution) I thought that it was uncharacteristic—not to say unworthy—of the noble Lord, Lord Whitty, to sugges...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c128 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 3: Page 1, line 9, at beginning insert ““subject to the objectives in paragrap...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c126-7 (Link to this contribution) I agree with a huge amount of what the noble Lord said. I say again that the Government took on boar...
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c125-6 (Link to this contribution) I do believe we are making progress. I referred to the general principle of ““in the public interest...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c134-5 (Link to this contribution) Once again, we have had an interesting debate. In a sense, we began from Sir David Clementi’s final ...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c135 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister and to all noble Lords who have spoken in this debate. My objective is...
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c135-6 (Link to this contribution) While we are still dealing with Clause 1, I wanted to tell the Minister how much the Joint Committee...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c131-2 (Link to this contribution) In speaking to the question of whether Clause 1 should stand part of the Bill, I shall speak also to...
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c133 (Link to this contribution) I strongly support the noble Lord in opposing the question whether Clause 1 stand part of the Bill a...
Viscount Bledisloe | 688 c133-4 (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I may sound a word of caution. If you have three different boards with three different sets ...
Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 688 c134 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for the last intervention, since I, too, came to the subject very late in our delibera...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c131 (Link to this contribution) We think it is for the regulator to determine in a particular set of circumstances which objective i...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c131 (Link to this contribution) I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. On Question, Whether Clause...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c116-7 (Link to this contribution) moved AmendmentNo. 1: 1: Clause 1 , page 1, line 7, at end insert— ““( ) protecting and promoting ...
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c117-8 (Link to this contribution) I strongly agree. It is difficult to understand what has changed since the previous Lord Chancellor ...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c116 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, on behalf of my noble and learned friend, I beg to move that the House do now resolve itse...
Lord Lloyd of Berwick | 688 c120 (Link to this contribution) If the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, is correct about the Minister’s body language, I wish to say no more a...
Lord Graham of Edmonton | 688 c120 (Link to this contribution) As a person who does not claim to be at all familiar with the law, the legal professions or legal se...
Lord Campbell of Alloway | 688 c118-9 (Link to this contribution) I agree with everything that was said by the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, and my noble frien...
Lord Neill of Bladen | 688 c119-20 (Link to this contribution) I spoke on Second Reading about this Bill and should perhaps declare my interest as a practising bar...
Baroness Carnegy of Lour | 688 c120-1 (Link to this contribution) I hope that we will make very heavy weather of this. I look forward to the Minister’s response, but ...
Lord Lyell of Markyate | 688 c121 (Link to this contribution) I support the objective of both amendments, although I slightly prefer Amendment No. 1. There is an ...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c121-2 (Link to this contribution) My name is attached to Amendment No. 2. I was a little unnerved by the intervention of the noble Lor...
Lord Clinton-Davis | 688 c122 (Link to this contribution) Will the noble Lord take this opportunity to reply to the points raised by my noble friend about the...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c122-3 (Link to this contribution) I do not think that I mentioned the legal profession in my reply. I certainly do not think that the ...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c123-4 (Link to this contribution) I am clearly going to have to keep my body under control during the passage of this Bill. I should n...
Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 688 c124 (Link to this contribution) I wonder whether the Minister would be quite specific in addressing the point that has been made abo...
Baroness Carnegy of Lour | 688 c124-5 (Link to this contribution) Will the noble Baroness bear in mind that the public understand very well the need for both these th...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c125 (Link to this contribution) What I should have said, as the noble Lord, Lord Hunt of Wirral, quite rightly indicated, is that it...
Lord Whitty | 688 c121 (Link to this contribution) I hope that the Minister’s body language is not too conciliatory on this. I declare an interest as c...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c137 (Link to this contribution) I do not think that we have abolished it. My noble and learned friend is the Lord Chancellor and the...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c167 (Link to this contribution) I beg my noble friend’s pardon, but I thought he asked why the first chairman should be a lawyer. Ma...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c140 (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I do not sound like a member of the Opposition.
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c136 (Link to this contribution) Thank you. Clause 1 agreed to. Clause 2 agreed to. [Amendment No. 3A not moved.] Schedule 1 [The...
Lord Thomas of Gresford | 688 c173 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendments Nos. 25 to 30: 25: Schedule 1 , page 114, line 20, leave out ““Secretary of State...
Lord Bach | 688 c153-4 (Link to this contribution) What the Joint Committee said on this cannot be taken as gospel or as binding what this Committee de...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c137 (Link to this contribution) I am telling the noble Lord what we did, not what any press release might have said.
Lord Hunt of Wirral | 688 c138 (Link to this contribution) I am not sure that this is a road that I should be walking slowly down, but I wanted to put the reco...
Baroness Ashton of Upholland | 688 c124 (Link to this contribution) They are. The purpose of the phrase ““have regard to”” was to focus on the particular institutions, ...
Viscount Bledisloe | 688 c142 (Link to this contribution) I entirely agree with the noble Lord, Lord Kingsland, about the different duty that rests on the Lor...
Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 688 c130-1 (Link to this contribution) I intrude in the debate a little tardily but feel it is important to indicate to the noble Lord, Lor...
Lord Kingsland | 688 c130 (Link to this contribution) I did not have the privilege of featuring in debate on the then Compensation Bill. I was unaware, th...
Back to top