UK Parliament / Open data

Environmental Impact Assessment (Agriculture) (England) Regulations 2006

Debates on delegated legislation on Tuesday, 5 December 2006, in the House of Lords, led by Baroness Byford. The answering member was Lord Rooker.
Environmental Impact Assessment (Agriculture) (England) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/2362). Lords debate on a motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Also debated with Environmental Impact Assessment (Agriculture) (England) (No 2) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/2522). Grand Committee held in the Moses Room.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
687 c15-26GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Environmental Impact Assessment (Agriculture) (England) (No. 2) Regulations 2006
Tuesday, 5 December 2006
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
Environmental Impact Assessment (Agriculture) (England) (No2) Regulations 2006
Friday, 15 September 2006
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
Environmental Impact Assessment (Agriculture) (England) Regulations 2006
Thursday, 7 September 2006
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
Proceeding contributions
Lord Rooker | 687 c18GC (Link to this contribution) Go on, make yourself.
Baroness Byford | 687 c15-7GC (Link to this contribution) rose to move, That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Environment...

Show all contributions (17)
Baroness Byford | 687 c15GC (Link to this contribution) As the noble Lord, Lord Rooker, is not in the Committee Room, the Whip has suggested that we delay t...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 687 c15GC (Link to this contribution) I think that that is a sensible course of action. I do not know how long the Minister will be.
Lord Rooker | 687 c24GC (Link to this contribution) On Natural England, there will be a method of appeal for the farmer to the Secretary of State. If it...
Lord Rooker | 687 c19GC (Link to this contribution) I will be happy to try to answer the points raised by the noble Baroness and the noble Lord. There i...
Lord Greaves | 687 c17-8GC (Link to this contribution) I congratulate the noble Baroness, Lady Byford, on bringing this matter to the Grand Committee and t...
Viscount Allenby of Megiddo | 687 c15GC (Link to this contribution) The Grand Committee stands adjourned for 20 minutes. [The Sitting was suspended from 4.31 to 4.51 p...
Lord Rooker | 687 c19-24GC (Link to this contribution) Sorry, that is true, but the title of the second regulations has (No. 2) in it. That was not said by...
Baroness Byford | 687 c24GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for his full response. He said I was nit-picking, but it has given us ...
Baroness Byford | 687 c24-5GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for that, and to the noble Lord, Lord Greaves, for his questions. We o...
Baroness Byford | 687 c25GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for that. At the beginning of the debate I referred to the Minister’s presentation of ...
Lord Rooker | 687 c25GC (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I may save myself from writing a letter. In answer to the question of why UK regulations are...
Lord Rooker | 687 c25GC (Link to this contribution) That is the dilemma. I shall take advice and perhaps write to the noble Baroness on that, but if mat...
Lord Greaves | 687 c18-9GC (Link to this contribution) Perhaps it is a good thing that I did not hear that. There are some substantive issues here which ar...
Baroness Byford | 687 c19GC (Link to this contribution) I thought when I started that the two went together, so I was speaking to both of them.
Baroness Byford | 687 c26GC (Link to this contribution) I suspect that the responsibility is shared almost equally by his Government and mine and that it sh...
Back to top