Parliamentary search - London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill

Type

Parliamentary proceeding

Reference

678 c383-420GC

Session

2005-06

Department

Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Legislative stage

Committee stage

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords Grand Committee

London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill. Brought from Commons . Explanatory Notes HL Bill 52-EN also published .(Bill previously known as London Olympics Bill)
Wednesday, 7 December 2005
Bills
House of Lords

Proceeding contributions

Lord Davies of Oldham | 678 c402-4GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for the contributions to these amendments, although they take me down legal paths that...

Lord Borrie | 678 c387GC (Link to this contribution) Does the Minister agree that, as the Bill stands, unless the person who is said to have infringed an...

Show all contributions (46)

Lord Clement-Jones | 678 c392-3GC (Link to this contribution) I am not sure that will be the case technically. Let me give an example of a case based on section 1...

Lord Glentoran | 678 c412GC (Link to this contribution) Sydney.

Baroness Hamwee | 678 c413-5GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 82:"Page 25, line 3, at end insert—" ““( ) References in sections 61 and 6...

Lord Clement-Jones | 678 c412-3GC (Link to this contribution) Sure, but I was asking the Minister whether he had evidence. I was not proposing to adduce evidence ...

Baroness Hamwee | 678 c417GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Claus...

Baroness Hamwee | 678 c417GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for that reply. At the risk of testing your Lordships’ patience for one more moment, p...

Lord Davies of Oldham | 678 c412GC (Link to this contribution) I have not drawn it out of a hat—it is an important piece of evidence. I warn the noble Lord that, l...

Lord Clement-Jones | 678 c405-7GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 75:"Page 50, line 21, at end insert—" The London Olympics association right...

Lord Borrie | 678 c408-9GC (Link to this contribution) I support and commend the amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, to which my name is attac...

Lord Glentoran | 678 c407-8GC (Link to this contribution) There is little for me to say after the excellent advocacy of the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones. My...

Lord Geddes | 678 c409GC (Link to this contribution) A Division has been called in the Chamber. The Committee stands adjourned for 10 minutes, when we wi...

Lord Davies of Oldham | 678 c398GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to Members of the Committee who have contributed to the debate. It is a serious matter...

Lord Clement-Jones | 678 c398-9GC (Link to this contribution) The Minister has tried to answer the question, ““Why not?””, posed by the noble Lords, Lord Glentora...

Lord Borrie | 678 c397GC (Link to this contribution) I express my support for this amendment on the assumption that paragraph (3) remains in the Bill. I ...

Lord Glentoran | 678 c397GC (Link to this contribution) I rise to support the amendment and to make two points. First, following on from what the noble Lord...

Lord Clement-Jones | 678 c394-5GC (Link to this contribution) Time will tell. I am willing to be reasonable and use other language such as ““presumption of liabil...

Lord Borrie | 678 c394GC (Link to this contribution) Before my noble friend sits down, and with the permission of the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, may...

Lord Glentoran | 678 c394GC (Link to this contribution) I am not of legal mind, unlike other Members of the Committee, and have attempted to listen to this ...

Lord Clement-Jones | 678 c399-401GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 71:"Page 50, line 1, leave out ““as a necessary incident”” and insert ““in the c...

Lord Glentoran | 678 c401-2GC (Link to this contribution) I am sorry that my noble friend Lord Brooke is not here to speak to his amendment. I have no brief f...

Lord Davies of Oldham | 678 c387-92GC (Link to this contribution) My noble friend will give me chance to deploy the case. I am seeking to establish that it is not the...

Lord Clement-Jones | 678 c392GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for that very interesting response. I also thank the noble Lord, Lord Borrie, f...

Lord Borrie | 678 c385-6GC (Link to this contribution) As my name is attached to the amendment, perhaps I may speak to it also and commend the words of the...

Baroness Gould of Potternewton | 678 c383GC (Link to this contribution) Good afternoon. I have to make a statement to begin with. If there is a Division in the Chamber whil...

Lord Davies of Oldham | 678 c417GC (Link to this contribution) I think that I am. If the ODA were relying on what I would regard as a technicality and stating that...

Lord Clement-Jones | 678 c404-5GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for his reply. I am extremely grateful that we have to debate only UK law here,...

Lord Davies of Oldham | 678 c409-12GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to noble Lords who have spoken in this short debate. It is important, and I recognise ...

Lord Glentoran | 678 c417-8GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 83:"Page 25, line 40, after ““agency”” insert ““working in co-operation with rel...

Lord Davies of Oldham | 678 c418GC (Link to this contribution) I think I shall be able to allay the fears of the noble Lord and those of his colleague, the noble L...

Lord Geddes | 678 c418GC (Link to this contribution) A Division has been called in the Chamber. The Grand Committee stands adjourned for 10 minutes or un...

Lord Glentoran | 678 c419-20GC (Link to this contribution) As a non-expert in this field who speaks on behalf of my noble friend, the Minister has certainly sa...

Lord Davies of Oldham | 678 c418-9GC (Link to this contribution) We put in these powers for the RDAs just as a failsafe. If the ODA needed an RDA to buy some land in...

Lord Davies of Oldham | 678 c386-7GC (Link to this contribution) This is a significant amendment, which takes us into technical and legal territory, so my response w...

Lord Glentoran | 678 c386GC (Link to this contribution) I, too, support the amendment, and I shall not be long-winded. I declare another interest, which cam...

Lord Davies of Oldham | 678 c392GC (Link to this contribution) That might exactly be the case. We can all envisage circumstances where a respondent provides exactl...

Lord Davies of Oldham | 678 c412GC (Link to this contribution) No, it was Atlanta that he mentioned.

Baroness Hamwee | 678 c416-7GC (Link to this contribution) I may wear two hats, but at least they are consistent in this situation. I am grateful to the Minist...

Lord Davies of Oldham | 678 c415-6GC (Link to this contribution) We believe that we have put a robust system in place to govern the games and to co-ordinate the work...

Lord Davies of Oldham | 678 c417GC (Link to this contribution) Yes.

Lord Borrie | 678 c409GC (Link to this contribution) I suggested earlier that I do not think that there is much risk of ambush marketing and infringement...

Lord Clement-Jones | 678 c412GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for that response, and I thank the noble Lords, Lord Borrie and Lord Glentoran,...

Lord Clement-Jones | 678 c395-7GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 70:"Page 48, line 18, after ““instrument,”” insert—" ““( ) may be made onl...

Lord Clement-Jones | 678 c383-5GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 69:"Page 47, line 33, leave out from ““shall”” to end of line 35 and insert ““no...

Lord Davies of Oldham | 678 c393-4GC (Link to this contribution) In case the noble Lord is about to withdraw his amendment—I am eager for him to do so; we should mak...

Subjects

Accountability

Broadcasting

Advertising

Land

Greater London

Intellectual property

Olympic Games

Newspaper press

Marketing

Paralympic Games

Regulation