Lords debate on motion to call attention to the case for a government policy towards the Royal Mail which best reflects the national interest in all respects. Motion withdrawn.
Royal Mail
Parliamentary proceeding on Thursday, 12 January 2006,
in the House of Lords,
led by Lord Clarke of Hampstead.
The answering
member was Lord Sainsbury of Turville.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
677 c303-44
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Proceeding contributions
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 677 c337-43 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I first thank the noble Baroness for giving me the time to respond to this extremely inter...
Lord Clarke of Hampstead | 677 c343-4 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, in the three minutes left before I am advised this debate has to conclude, I want to thank...
Show all contributions (19)
Lord Christopher | 677 c330-2 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I am sure everyone is glad that my noble and long-time personal friend Lord Clarke has bro...
Lord Razzall | 677 c334 (Link to this contribution)
I did not, my Lords.
Baroness Miller of Hendon | 677 c334-7 (Link to this contribution)
No, my Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Razzall, most certainly did not, but he was about the only one. D...
Lord Razzall | 677 c332-4 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I join other speakers in thanking the noble Lord, Lord Clarke of Hampstead, for introducin...
Baroness Miller of Hendon | 677 c334 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, along with other noble Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Clarke of Hampstead, for introd...
Lord Dearing | 677 c319-21 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Clarke of Hampstead, for initiating this debate and ...
Lord Warner | 677 c321 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I respectfully remind the House that this is a time-limited debate. We are running over an...
Lord Sawyer | 677 c321-4 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lord Clarke of Hampstead for initiating this debate. This is a goo...
Lord Hoyle | 677 c324-5 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I must first declare an interest. I am a member of Amicus, which represents the Royal Mail...
Lord Young of Norwood Green | 677 c326-7 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lord Clarke for initiating this debate. Like him, I, too, declare ...
Baroness Prosser | 677 c328-30 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I, too, thank my noble friend Lord Clarke for setting down this subject for debate. Like o...
Lord Cameron of Dillington | 677 c310-3 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, as has just been mentioned, one of the areas where there are the strongest concerns amongs...
Lord Brookman | 677 c313-4 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I echo the thanks of other noble Lords for a further opportunity to discuss the Post Offic...
Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan | 677 c314-6 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I join my colleagues in congratulating my noble friend on securing this debate. Indeed, it...
Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe | 677 c316-9 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend Lord Clarke of Hampstead for sponsoring the debate. This ...
Lord De Mauley | 677 c308-10 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I thank and congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Clarke of Hampstead, for initiating this tim...
Lord Clarke of Hampstead | 677 c303-8 (Link to this contribution)
rose to call attention to the case for a government policy towards the Royal Mail which best reflect...
Subjects
Contains statistics
Yes
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-01-08 10:27:43 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_54238
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_54238
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_54238