I, too, congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland (Tom Blenkinsop) on securing the debate, which coincides with this afternoon's Budget statement. If press reports are true, the statement's main concern will be the tax affairs of people earning more than £150,000 a year. Our concern is different: it involves the hundreds of jobs lost as a result of the closure of Thamesteel and, more generally, manufacturing and steelmaking and their importance to our economy.
It is likely that we will hear a lot this afternoon about rebalancing the economy between finance and industry—indeed, the Chancellor ended his first Budget with a call for a ““march of the makers””—but at Thamesteel, the makers have lost their jobs and, as my hon. Friend said, we as a nation have lost the product. I have some experience of that in my constituency, where the huge Bilston steelworks closed many years ago. I hope that that does not happen to the constituency of the hon. Member for Sittingbourne and Sheppey (Gordon Henderson), but most of my constituents would say that the area has never fully recovered from the loss of such a major employer.
I do not want to do what often happens in such debates by going over the history of the decline of manufacturing in the UK. Too many of this House's debates on the subject are characterised by looking in the rear-view mirror. Perhaps we focus too little on globalisation's impact on our manufacturing industries and on the possibilities for the future, which is what I hope we can concentrate on.
Manufacturing and steelmaking are still very important to the UK, even if we do less than we did many years ago. There are things that Governments can do—they are not powerless—to support those activities. I have referred to the Chancellor's Budgets, and his autumn statement gave a relatively small rebate on energy and environmental costs to energy-intensive producers. The scale of that rebate was a fraction of those available in Germany, but at least it represented recognition that the Government have a role to play in trying to ensure that energy-intensive industries remain in the UK.
Thamesteel
Proceeding contribution from
Pat McFadden
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 21 March 2012.
It occurred during Adjournment debate on Thamesteel.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
542 c203-4WH 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-09-24 08:50:05 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_820253
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_820253
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_820253