The hon. Gentleman will know that the 1906 Act, which was drafted by Sir Mackenzie Dalzell Chalmers, is commended to the House by many insurance lawyers as a wonderful piece of drafting. I suppose, as this is my first intervention in this debate, that I should refer the House to my entry in the Register of Members' Financial Interests; I am an insurance practitioner. Does the hon. Gentleman think that it is a good idea for Parliament to intervene in this way, given that there are certain respects in which the 1906 Act altered the common law? For example, the test of loss in relation to marine insurance now differs from the test of loss in relation to non-marine insurance.
Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Stephen Phillips
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 6 March 2012.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
541 c769 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 15:47:01 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_814849
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_814849
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_814849