Obviously those provisions are of paramount importance, but as I made clear in my opening remarks, the right to a fair trial is also equally important.
The second major point made by the noble Lord was on the state of readiness of the police, which goes wider than the matter we are debating today. The noble Lord rightly said that when I introduced these rules, I made it clear that I was confident that that was the case, but before he even asked the question, he wrote down that I had moved from being confident to being satisfied, which formed the basis of the question he put to me. I can give the noble Lord an assurance that I am satisfied that everything is in place as it should be, and that I think the same is true of the police. With that, I hope that the Motion will be agreed.
Motion agreed.
Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 3) Rules 2012
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Henley
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 January 2012.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 3) Rules 2012.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
734 c166GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 20:49:26 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_802810
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_802810
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_802810