I do not know how Hansard is going to get the word ““cock-up”” in, but there it is again.
The MMO is a quango with almost no ministerial control whatever. Many of the civil servants in the previous incarnation did not transfer to the new organisation because it was reincarnated in Newcastle. Much of the personal knowledge about this particular case was not transferred. Once we have got through this—I must ensure that I do not interfere with any judicial process—we will be looking very closely at the matter. Remember this is a Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and Department for Transport issue. Do not get me wrong, the Minister would never have seen this; it would never have got to him. This was below the radar level. None the less, it is quite simple to say, ““You looked at these ports and you asked for this, this and this. When you came to this port, you didn't ask for something that you have asked for at nearly every other port that I have looked at.”” We will address this matter.
I want to look at how the MMO works. As the Minister standing before the Chamber, listening to colleagues and going on visits, it is enormously frustrating having very little control over things such as the harbour revision order. Even if the whole local community and the MP is against that order, all I can do is advise the MMO; I cannot actually instruct it.
Port of Southampton
Proceeding contribution from
Mike Penning
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 18 January 2012.
It occurred during Adjournment debate on Port of Southampton.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
538 c286WH 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 22:38:49 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_801819
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_801819
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_801819