UK Parliament / Open data

The Economy

Proceeding contribution from George Osborne (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 6 December 2011. It occurred during Debate on The Economy.
We restricted cash payouts in the Royal Bank of Scotland in the last bonus round to less than £2,000. That is what we did when we had the opportunity. The hon. Lady was a Minister in the last Government. Perhaps in 30 years' time we will discover that she was sending letters to the Treasury asking ““What are we doing about transparency in pay in the City? Why do we not introduce a permanent bank levy?””, and saying ““I am really worried about the regulation of Britain's financial services.”” We will just have to wait for 30 years to find out whether, when she held Executive office, she once raised the concerns that she now raises in opposition. Both the slow repair of our banking system and the crisis in the eurozone were identified by the Office for Budget Responsibility as causes of weaker economic activity. They are also a reminder of why it is so essential for Britain to maintain its fiscal credibility as we deal with a budget deficit that is higher than almost any other in the world. A month ago I was told by the OBR, as part of the formal preparation for the autumn forecast, that weaker economic activity would give Britain a less than 50% chance of meeting the fiscal mandate and the debt target that I had set out unless we took further action. I believe that at that moment the OBR proved not just its independence, but its worth. It forced the Government to confront the issues at hand, and to use the weeks available to us before the statement to come up with a credible response. We know that under the previous forecast regime, those weeks would have been used to fiddle the forecasts, to tweak assumptions about the output gap, and to pencil in over-optimistic numbers on tax receipts: in other words, to do all the things that my predecessor, in his memoirs, says were done during his dealings with No. 10 Downing street. It would have been a case of choosing economic figures to fit the Government's policies, rather than choosing Government policies to respond to the economic figures. I believe that the existence of the Office for Budget Responsibility, which was consistently opposed by the shadow Chancellor in every position that he held in the last Government, has given the whole of Parliament confidence in the integrity of the forecast.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
537 c182-3 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top