Yes, but the problem is that the public will, with some justification, believe the worst of us after the expenses scandal. They had all those assurances before. The excuses will not work, and we need clarity and simplicity in the way we behave. It is entirely wrong for a Member of Parliament to be employed by a company—£30,000 is a substantial amount, many times the minimum wage—and, having taken that money, to raise subjects on which the company concerned is campaigning, and then say, ““Of course, this is about the interests of my constituency; it approached me on the issue.”” That is what the hon. Gentleman in question says. I believe that the public are right to be suspicious of us, and I refer to the words of the Prime Minister in that regard.
Parliamentary Lobbying
Proceeding contribution from
Paul Flynn
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 2 November 2011.
It occurred during Adjournment debate on Parliamentary Lobbying.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
534 c268WH 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 21:29:39 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_781333
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_781333
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_781333