My Lords, I thank the Minister for her response and the answers that she has given to the questions that I raised. I understand from what the Minister said that the issue of police coming from other forces will be determined by agreement with those other forces and that it will be on the basis of full reimbursement of costs. That is what I understood was the thrust of the answer I was given.
I also noticed that the Minister said that the basis of the reimbursement of costs would enable back-filling. I am not sure whether that will be done by reductions in annual leave, cancelling rest days or cancelling training, as appears to be the case as far as the Metropolitan Police is concerned. Certainly, one hopes that if that those are the ways in which the additional capacity will be made available, they do not happen to an excessive extent. As I mentioned in my contribution, we do not want police forces that are already stretched with regard to numbers also stretched through fatigue. However, in the light of the response that the Minister has given me, which I will wish to read again carefully in Hansard, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment 9 withdrawn.
Amendment 10 not moved.
Amendment 11
Moved by
London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (Amendment) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Rosser
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 25 October 2011.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (Amendment) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
731 c257GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 21:07:32 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_777994
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_777994
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_777994