UK Parliament / Open data

Localism Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 10 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on bills on Localism Bill.
My Lords, my amendments take out the whole of Chapter 1 of Part 4. I would be quite happy to take out the whole of Part 4 but I do not think I would get quite so much enthusiasm from the government Front Bench. Like my noble friend Lord Lucas, I have some concern that localism in this Bill is very rurally orientated—village-orientated and small-town-orientated—while over half the population of this country lives in large towns and cities. We have a lot of hard work to do in working out how localism will work in those areas. I am grateful for the very welcome support of the noble Lord, Lord Beecham. I do not agree with him, as he knows, about the petitioning procedure which has been removed. When the Bill introducing that procedure came to this House, I struggled manfully to stop it. I am delighted that it has now gone, and I am delighted that struggling manfully against this Bill has had a little more success. That does not mean to say that councils should not deal with petitions properly, expeditiously and seriously: they clearly should. However, bureaucratic procedures laid down from on high are not the way to do so. Finally, I congratulate and thank my noble friend the Minister, and the whole Government but particularly the Communities and Local Government Ministers, on and for their support for these amendments. Amendment 195ZAZN agreed. Clause 43 : Petition for local referendum Clause 43 : Petition for local referendum Amendments 195ZAZNZA and 195ZAZNA not moved. Amendment 195ZAZP Moved by
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
730 c1413 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Legislation
Localism Bill 2010-12
Back to top