UK Parliament / Open data

Localism Bill

Proceeding contribution from Earl Attlee (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 10 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on bills on Localism Bill.
195ZAZD: After Clause 32, Insert the following new Clause— ““Matters to be determined before a final notice is given (1) This section applies where— (a) a warning notice has been given to a public authority; and (b) the panel has considered all representations made to it under the procedures set out in that notice. (2) The panel must make, to a Minister of the Crown, a report on the matters to which the representations made to the panel relate. (3) The report— (a) may be published by the panel in such manner as the panel thinks fit and, if not published by the panel, must be published by the Minister of the Crown to whom it is made in such manner as the Minister of the Crown thinks fit; (b) must include recommendations as to the determination of the matters mentioned in subsection (4)(a) and (b); (c) if the authority has made representations to the panel about anything the authority considers relevant to any of the matters mentioned in paragraphs (c) to (e) of subsection (4), must include recommendations as to the determination of the matters mentioned in those paragraphs; and (d) must include the panel’s reasons for any recommendations included in the report. (4) After having had regard to the report, a Minister of the Crown must determine the following matters— (a) whether any acts of the authority did cause or contribute to the infraction of EU law concerned and, in relation to any periodic payments mentioned in subsection (3)(c) of section 32, whether those acts have continued and will continue to do so; (b) the proportion of— (i) the total amount of the sanction (as specified under subsection (3)(b) of that section), and (ii) any periodic payments (as specified under subsection (3)(c) of that section), that, in the light of the acts of the authority which are determined to have had or to be having an effect mentioned in paragraph (a), is to be regarded as reflecting the authority’s share of the responsibility for the infraction of EU law concerned or, in relation to any such periodic payments, the continuing infraction of EU law concerned; (c) whether the authority should be required to make any payment or payments in respect of the EU financial sanction; (d) if so, what payment or payments the authority should make towards— (i) the total amount of the sanction specified under subsection (3)(b) of that section; and (ii) any periodic payments specified under subsection (3)(c) of that section; and (e) when any such payment or payments should be made. (5) In determining the matters mentioned in subsection (4)(c), (d) and (e) the Minister of the Crown must have regard to— (a) the effect on the authority’s finances of any amount it may be required to pay and in particular, if the authority has mixed functions, the need to avoid any prejudicial effect on the performance by the authority of its devolved functions; (b) the determination under subsection (4)(b); and (c) any other relevant considerations. (6) Before making a final decision on the matters mentioned in subsection (4)(c), (d) and (e), the Minister of the Crown must invite— (a) representations from the authority about the potential effect on its finances and, if it has mixed functions, the effect on its devolved functions of any amount it may be required to pay; and (b) if the authority has mixed functions, representations from the appropriate national authority.”” Amendment 195ZAZD agreed. Clause 33 : EU financial sanction notices Amendments 195ZAZE and 195ZAZF Clause 33 : EU financial sanction notices Amendments 195ZAZE and 195ZAZF Moved by
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
730 c1385-6 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Legislation
Localism Bill 2010-12
Back to top