I thank the noble Lord for that assurance. There is a fundamental disconnect, I feel, between the approach that I and my colleagues are taking and the one that the Minister has taken. It is all to do, fundamentally, with whether the HD committee rules to which we keep referring are still fit for purpose. My contention is that they not fit for purpose. On that basis, I propose to ask for the view of the House.
Division on Amendment 8
Contents 208; Not-Contents 194.
Amendment 8 agreed.
Moved by
Armed Forces Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Craig of Radley
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 10 October 2011.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Armed Forces Bill..
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
730 c1348 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 13:11:39 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_771192
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_771192
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_771192