UK Parliament / Open data

Localism Bill

Proceeding contribution from Earl of Lytton (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 September 2011. It occurred during Debate on bills on Localism Bill.
My Lords, it falls to me to wind up and I shall be extremely brief given the lateness of the hour. For my part, I thank all noble Lords who have spoken and I particularly pay tribute to the noble Lords, Lord Bichard and Lord Filkin, for the meticulous way in which they have looked at the Bill and the way they have been prepared to enter into dialogue with me. I feel certain this has borne good fruit. I feel very much like a minnow among giants beside those noble Lords who have spoken and have far greater knowledge than I have of local government, and I am grateful for their indulgence towards me—a mere Johnny-come-lately. I thank the Minister for his willingness, and the willingness of his team, to discuss things. I am sure that it would be churlish not to take up his offer to look into this and to try to forge between us some workable solutions. I am mindful of the fact that various noble Lords have commented on the burdens that parish and town councils may place on standards committees of principal authorities. I take the point that was made in that regard by the noble Lord, Lord Beecham, and we must work to ensure that unnecessary burdens are not being added to principal authorities in this respect. The lateness of the hour compels me to get to the point and beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 166 withdrawn. Amendments 167 to 169 not moved. Clause 16 : Duty to promote and maintain high standards of conduct Amendment 170 Clause 16 : Duty to promote and maintain high standards of conduct Amendment 170 Moved by
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
730 c842 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Legislation
Localism Bill 2010-12
Back to top