UK Parliament / Open data

Armed Forces Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 8 September 2011. It occurred during Debate on bills and Committee proceeding on Armed Forces Bill.
My Lords, I put my name down as opposing this clause purely as a formality. When I first looked through the Bill, it seemed to me that the clause effectively took away all consultation on the matter of the application of by-laws. This was discussed at a private meeting and I have received a very constructive response from the Minister. However, the procedure that the Minister describes is an administrative one, and I advised him—I hope he has advised his representative today—that I would be entirely satisfied if he were to read the appropriate assurances in the letter into the record. A letter is an ephemeral thing, whereas Hansard is permanent and more effective. I beg to move.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
730 c105GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Back to top