My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Baroness. I think I am more sympathetic to the Government’s word ““appropriate”” than to the suggested use of the word ““necessary””. In the context of the Bill, both these words are actually subjective in terms of what is being looked at. I assume that the Government prefers ““appropriate”” because I would have thought that it would be easier to argue either for or against in court than ““necessary”” would be, because that word is rather different. Is that not the thinking behind the Government’s proposal? I understand the arguments, but the central issue seems to be that of appeal. It would be easier for a court to reach a decision on what is ““appropriate”” than on what is ““necessary””. However, please tell me if I am wrong.
Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Soley
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 14 July 2011.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
729 c874 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 18:06:39 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_761120
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_761120
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_761120