UK Parliament / Open data

Education Bill

Proceeding contribution from Earl of Listowel (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 6 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on bills and Committee proceeding on Education Bill.
My Lords, I thank the Minister warmly for his encouraging response, and I thank noble Lords for expressing sympathy at least for the principles behind the amendments—I am very grateful for that. I need to think more about costs, particularly for developing classroom observation. A number of noble Lords pointed out the cost of having teachers away from the class and of having teachers observing other teachers. I want to make sure that that is kept in mind. Perhaps I might also briefly apologise for something that I said earlier in Committee about the early years workforce. I made some comments that I regret. It is widely recognised that capacity in that area is fairly low and I might have dwelt more on the very positive experience that I have had of meeting people who have a strong vocation in that area of work. With that, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 66 withdrawn. Amendment 67 not moved. Clause 9 : Requirement for teachers in England to serve induction period Amendment 68 Clause 9 : Requirement for teachers in England to serve induction period Amendment 68 Moved by
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
729 c130GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Back to top