Whether it is a nine year-old, an 11 year-old or a 12 year-old, the same safeguarding issues are still absolutely there and valid. I am afraid that the problem with the plethora of legislation that was quoted earlier is that it is too easy to miss. There were comments earlier about the message that the Bill sends out about this. There is a clear message from both of these amendments that children’s safeguarding comes first, which is why parents should be notified.
I hope that Ministers will take into account much of the discussion that we have had today, and will able to come back at later stages of the Bill. For now, however, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment 61 withdrawn.
Clause 5 agreed.
Amendment 62 not moved.
Clause 6: Repeal of duty to enter into behaviour and attendance partnership
Amendment 63
Clause 6: Repeal of duty to enter into behaviour and attendance partnership
Amendment 63
Moved by
Education Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Brinton
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 July 2011.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Education Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
729 c38GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 21:15:38 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_756245
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_756245
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_756245