UK Parliament / Open data

Constitutional Reform (Wales)

Proceeding contribution from Chris Evans (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 19 May 2011. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Constitutional Reform (Wales).
Sorry, Isle of Wight is a Tory seat. I was working with my predecessor when the Government of Wales Act 2006 was debated. The 2006 Act stated that Assembly seats must be co-terminus with Westminster seats, but that has suddenly been thrown out of the window. It is as if the Government are saying, ““Okay, we will just decouple.”” Where we have an Assembly Member, the imperative is to build a close relationship with them and to work on issues such as health and education, but that will go completely out of the window. We will have a situation in which people will say, ““Who is my Assembly Member? Who do I pass this on to?”” This seems to be—for want of a better word—absolutely crackers. We have already talked about the democratic deficit. Despite the fact that Wales represents 5% of the UK population, its constituencies will be reduced by 20%. Wales will send 25 fewer MPs here. Northern Ireland will lose some 17%; Scotland will lose 9%; and England, which is Tory dominated, will lose 5.5%. We have to ask ourselves why Wales has been disproportionately targeted. I wonder whether it is because we have a history of sending back Labour Members of Parliament. Will Swindon, which has two Tory MPs, be reduced to just one seat? Will other places, such as Cheltenham and Gloucester—I know Cheltenham quite well—be reduced to one seat? Will Tewkesbury, the Cotswolds and Cheltenham, which have three Tory MPs, be one seat? I wonder. We wait and see.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
528 c151-2WH 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Back to top