My hon. Friend makes an excellent point in contrasting the lending policies of the banks with the bonuses that they seek to pay, particularly to their higher-end staff. The Government have to be much clearer in the regulatory demands that they impose on the banks, because they are speaking with forked tongue. On one hand, they are insisting that there is tighter regulation and that there is a regime to ensure that there are adequate reserves and far more stringency in the banks' investment policies. On the other hand, they are on the side of business, urging the banks to lend more money. It is not possible for them to have it both ways, and we must not fall into that trap either. Either the Government have to say, ““We want tighter regulation, and to hell with small business””, or they have to say, ““No, we want small businesses to thrive, because we want growth in the economy””, in which case the regulatory regime for banks has to allow for that.
That does not affect my hon. Friend's point, because he is absolutely right to contrast the bonus structure with the banks' lending policy. The bankers expect the situation to be all good for them, but it is not so good when they are dishing out the money at the other end.
Finance (No. 3) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Barry Gardiner
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 3 May 2011.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Finance (No. 3) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
527 c519 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 15:58:41 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_739354
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_739354
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_739354