My Lords, before we leave this subject, does the noble Lord, Lord Redesdale, not accept—he should accept it—that the construction of the Bill depends upon the courts, not upon what he says in this House? Therefore, on the example given by the noble Lord, Lord Pearson of Rannoch, the magistrates might take a totally different view from the noble Lord, Lord Redesdale. The highest that he can put it at this moment is that it is his view that, properly construed, the Bill means X, Y or Z. He certainly cannot give an assurance that that is the way in which the courts would interpret it.
Dog Control Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Richard
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Friday, 4 March 2011.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Dog Control Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
725 c1302 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 15:24:01 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_721216
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_721216
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_721216