My Lords, I declare an interest as a dog owner and I regret not having taken part in these proceedings before. As a dog owner I welcome the amendment tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Redesdale, to remove the words ““aggressive or”” from line 13, but he has left in the words ““dangerously out of control””. Who decides what ““dangerously out of control”” is? For instance, if a dog were to bark at a stranger on, shall we say, a public footpath in the country, the dog might only be saying hello in the way that some dogs do. But the person who has been barked at, especially if they have young children with them on an enjoyable stroll in the countryside, might regard that as a dog being dangerously out of control. My question to the noble Lord is this: is that an offence in the eye of the receiver? How is it to be decided? This seems to me to be very important because there really is enormous scope for confusion on the issue.
Dog Control Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Pearson of Rannoch
(UK Independence Party)
in the House of Lords on Friday, 4 March 2011.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Dog Control Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
725 c1300 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 19:04:41 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_721207
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_721207
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_721207