UK Parliament / Open data

Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill

My Lords, I confess that I am disappointed by the noble and learned Lord’s response. I do not think that it goes as far as the commitment that was given yesterday to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Falconer. I said that my hope was the Minister will today give a commitment that the Government will look at this again and that they will consider the arguments that I have put—and, doubtless, others will put—in the debate. Incidentally, the noble and learned Lord referred to 18 speakers. He is quite right—17 speakers supported me. Only one did not. I hope that we can have a sensible commitment to take things further on Report. I do not think, frankly, that I have any alternative, because the one thing I can do is to underline to the Government just how strongly people feel on this. I found the Minister’s argument on the substance of this case to be not all convincing. I thank everyone for taking part in the debate—all 18, even my noble friend—but I feel that I have no alternative but to test the opinion of the House. Division on Amendment 66 Contents 196; Not-Contents 122. Amendment 66 agreed. House resumed. Clause 11 : Number and distribution of seats Amendment 66ZA Moved by
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
724 c424 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Back to top