UK Parliament / Open data

Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill

I am not sure that I wholly agree with that. I certainly would not encourage people to speak, but let us be clear. Whips at all times have said, ““If you speak on this from the other side, you will be here very late tonight. Alternatively, we won’t get the Bill passed in time””. What matters to the Government, on this Bill more than any other, is time. That is what this is about. We need to be very clear about it, which is why I say that what happened earlier was a filibuster in reverse. It was a silent filibuster, if you like. That does not alter the fact that, on this issue, my reason for arguing and the reason why we diverted is precisely that the registration of citizens is important in the voting process. In the context of a Bill that is incredibly important constitutionally because of the power to alter the size of Parliament, you cannot argue that this is irrelevant. It is an important part of it. The Government need to show some willingness to move on these issues. If we agree that registration is not as good as it ought to be in this country and accept that at the moment the Electoral Commission does not have as much power and authority as one would like it to have to instruct local authorities, there is a duty on the Government to do more to make sure that representation on the electoral roll is as good as it can be. I would expect leadership from the Government on that. I would expect them to stand up and say, ““Yes, we will do this and we will discuss with other political parties how to deliver it””. That is the sort of statement on which we need to get some cross-party agreement for a very important Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
723 c1268 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Back to top