I am a little puzzled about the decision. What the hon. Gentleman refers to was clearly decided—he is right about that—but it does not seem to have been decided on the facts, which demonstrated savings for the armed services as well as efficiencies from the proposals, which were assessed very carefully before the decision to go ahead was made. So why was the decision made to change that? It had all-party support. There was careful examination of the benefits to the services. Where did the decision come from?
Defence Spending (Wales)
Proceeding contribution from
Alun Michael
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 8 December 2010.
It occurred during Adjournment debate on Defence Spending (Wales).
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
520 c75WH 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 21:45:16 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_692046
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_692046
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_692046