The hon. Gentleman is of course correct. There will be extra layers and extra opportunities for lawyers to intervene. It was no wonder that Lord Steyn commented in the light of the Hunting Act 2004 that it"““is not unthinkable that circumstances could arise where the courts may have to qualify a principle established on a different hypothesis of constitutionalism””."
I think that in plain English that means they would be interested to get their teeth into the proceedings in this place.
Fixed-term Parliaments Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Tristram Hunt
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 24 November 2010.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Fixed-term Parliaments Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
519 c340-1 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 19:21:11 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_685229
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_685229
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_685229