UK Parliament / Open data

Superannuation Bill

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Noakes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 26 October 2010. It occurred during Debate on bills on Superannuation Bill.
I am struggling with why, once we have Clause 1, which removes the requirement for consent, there is any requirement for anything else to be a fallback in Clause 2 with the underpinning of Clause 3. If Clause 1 takes away the need for consent and puts in place proper consultation, what is the necessity for any other part of this Bill?
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
721 c1151 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Back to top