Terrorist Asset-Freezing etc. Bill [HL]

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister. With regard to Amendment 75, I think he said that I was seeking information about the number of licences. In my mind, I was going rather wider than that. I do not think that this is just a matter of number, but I am not sure whether I heard him correctly. He might want to come back on the content of licences as well as the number. That is what I was looking for. The second amendment was consequential. I am not sure that it quite falls away given that we have progressed with regard to the court’s role by including appeals as well as judicial review. It would be quite perverse if the reviewer did not cover appeals and judicial reviews, so I do not think that I need to press that further. The Minister asked whether I had in mind the appointment of the same person by the two departments for the different types of review. That was not what I was thinking of; rather it was the crossover of responsibilities between the Treasury and the Home Office as they are both involved in the same subject matter. However, he has given me the assurances I sought. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 75 withdrawn. Amendment 76 not moved. Clause 24 agreed. Clause 25 : Independent review of operation of Part 1 Clause 25 : Independent review of operation of Part 1 Amendments 77 to 79 not moved. Clause 25 agreed. Clauses 26 and 27 agreed. Clause 28 : Liability of officers of body corporate etc. Amendment 80 Clause 28 : Liability of officers of body corporate etc. Amendment 80 Moved by