Football Clubs (Governance)

I think that if that recommendation emerged from this debate and was supported by Members in the hon. Lady's party, that would be a fantastic outcome. Hopefully, during the rest of the debate, we can tease out some further recommendations. This is a timely debate, because the calls for greater supporter involvement chime with the coalition Government's much-vaunted big society idea. It is altruism that drives supporter activism. Supporters' trusts are run by people who give their time, money, effort and skills for the love of the game. Their overriding motive is to see their clubs prosper, on and off the pitch. If the big society is all about citizens engaging proactively with activities and institutions that impact on their lives and the shared life of their communities—although, frankly, it all depends on which Minister is trying to define it—football governance reforms provide an ideal opportunity for the Government to push for improved supporter representation and involvement. The social benefits of supporter involvement are already in evidence. A report recently commissioned by Supporters Direct entitled ““The Social and Community Value of Football”” examined this issue in full and detailed the specific advantages of supporter ownership, including"““a greater sense of engagement and inclusion with fans and wider stakeholders; better integration with the community; more open and responsible governance; good relationships with local authorities, and partnerships with voluntary organisations.””" So there is really no excuse not to take this idea on board. The Conservative party made the right noises in its election manifesto, pledging that"““we will reform the football governance arrangements so co-operative ownership models can be established by supporters””." I note with a little concern that the coalition Government made a rather more non-committal promise to ““encourage”” reform in its coalition agreement in May. I may be splitting semantic hairs here, but I sincerely hope that that did not signal a downgrading of the commitment. My own party has a proven track record on football governance reform. It was the Labour Government who introduced the umbrella organisation for fans, Supporters Direct, in 1999. It also commissioned the Burns inquiry into football governance in 2005, and tackled the Football Association and other football governing authorities in 2009 over their failure both to work together and to implement reforms. The new Government have talked the talk on the big society and the role of football supporters in the governance of football clubs. The challenge now—I throw down the gauntlet for the Minister—is to walk the walk. I should say a word about supporters' trusts, as they are crucial to the success of this kind of democracy in action. They are formal, democratic and not-for-profit fans organisations and they aim to extend supporter ownership, representation and influence at their respective clubs. Sadly, if unsurprisingly, they have commonly been founded in response to financial or mismanagement crises at a club; crises that have compelled supporters to take matters into their own hands. On a far more positive note, supporters' trusts are generally voluntary, they operate effectively on minimal funding and members are motivated purely by their passion for the game. In that respect, they are true grass-roots movements and their successes prove that fan ownership, control or representation can work. Many of them are run along the lines of the extremely professional Northampton Town Supporters Trust, which was established in 1992. At that time, it was the first collective of its kind. It enjoys a shareholding in the second division club, as well as representation on the board of directors.