Of course I saw the letter, because it was emailed to me. As I have made clear, it was apparent from the letter that this was a business man who had knowledge of Sheffield and the industry and was making various representations. My view was that that should go to the officials. It went to the officials and the answer that came back was ““We have noted your letter, Mr Cook.”” That was it. There has been no further—[Interruption.] The reply is included in the replies that I have given to the local Members. It is clear—[Interruption.] No, I am sorry, but that is wrong.
The other question that has been raised by several hon. Members is the issue of the dilution of equity. I set out the situation clearly in my remarks earlier. The Government's decision had nothing to do with the shareholder structure. In my view, Dr Honeyman and his team deserve credit for putting this together—
Sheffield Forgemasters
Proceeding contribution from
Mark Prisk
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 21 July 2010.
It occurred during Adjournment debate on Sheffield Forgemasters.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
514 c531-2;514 c532 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 17:59:45 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_658096
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_658096
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_658096