I would be very happy to make a positive recommendation because I would like my country to recover quicker and for there to be more jobs and prosperity. I suggest that instead of mouthing the words "countercyclical regulation" but doing the opposite, the Government should try some countercyclical regulation. I and a few others were telling them in 2006-07 that everything was overheating and that they should have tightened the regulation of the banks. They did not; they made a big mistake. What we are now saying—those of us who have got the cycle right—is the opposite. They are now tightening too much at the bottom of the cycle. We must be somewhere near the bottom of the cycle—I hope that we are through the bottom of the cycle and have just begun to turn up. This is the point at which they should be relaxing the regulatory controls on cash and capital, particularly for the two nationalised banks, which nobody is going to worry about because they know they will just print whatever it takes to meet the obligations of those banks.
The regulator should be told to think countercyclically. The cash and capital controls should be relaxed at this stage of the cycle and tightened in a couple of years' time when the recovery is under way.
Budget Resolutions and Economic Situation
Proceeding contribution from
John Redwood
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 24 March 2010.
It occurred during Budget debate on Budget Resolutions and Economic Situation.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
508 c292 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 20:39:51 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_633558
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_633558
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_633558