It will be in our manifesto. We see the introduction of a road-user charging scheme that is cost-neutral as the long-term solution to both congestion and the cost of motoring, as the typical motorist would pay no more than they do at present and those making greener choices would pay significantly less. That would go hand in hand with the abolition of vehicle excise duty and a reduction in fuel duty.
The hon. Member for Ribble Valley referred to the fact that foreign lorries currently pay nothing to use our roads. We would deal with that by ensuring that the lorry element of the road charging scheme would raise revenue and that foreign lorries, as well as British lorries, would pay to use the roads.
I am not sure how long I have to speak, given that few other Members wish to make speeches, but I will move on to road safety and say a few words about speed cameras. I must disagree with the hon. Gentleman because, in my opinion, speed cameras are a good thing. If people do not speed, they do not pay the speed camera tax, or whatever one calls it. The fact is that speed cameras save lives.
Motoring
Proceeding contribution from
John Leech
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 9 March 2010.
It occurred during Adjournment debate on Motoring.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
507 c11WH 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-06-21 11:51:09 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_628687
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_628687
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_628687