I am most grateful to the Minister. I drew the analogy because if we cannot find ways to help the poor—and poor children in particular—then that is the bill we will face in 2020. That is the point. It is the context in which one starts to look at interventions. If one does not have effective interventions then that is the bill at the end of the road. That is the reason I used the juxtaposition.
As I said, this is an important issue. That is why I raised it as an amendment. In light of the response, I beg leave to withdraw it.
Amendment 17 withdrawn.
Amendment 18 not moved.
Amendments 19 to 20 not moved.
Clause 9 : Provision of advice by Commission and consultation with others
Clause 9 : Provision of advice by Commission and consultation with others
Amendment 21 not moved.
Amendment 22
Moved by
Child Poverty Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Freud
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 9 March 2010.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Child Poverty Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
718 c223 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 20:02:57 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_628618
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_628618
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_628618