My Lords, I am grateful for the support of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Carswell. Amendments 6 and 7 are, to some extent, alternatives. They are tabled to highlight the problem of how we assess the damages that should be paid out for something that is asymptomatic. That is the point I was seeking to address and I am grateful for the debate on it.
I shall want to come back to this on Report because there are real concerns involved. I note what the noble and learned Lord, the Minister and the noble Baroness have said. I shall seek to bring the amendments or something similar back later. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw Amendment 6.
Amendment 6 withdrawn.
Amendment 7 not moved.
Clause 1 agreed
Amendment 8 not moved.
Amendment 9
Moved by
Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Henley
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Friday, 5 March 2010.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
717 c1714-5 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 20:11:58 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_627129
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_627129
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_627129