Of course they are relevant. I am using the procedures of the House to ensure that the Government explain their scheme. They made the announcement as a direct result of the Bill introduced by the noble Baroness, and the Bill in another place. If the noble Lord says that that is not the case, I have doubts. Noble Lords are giving their view on the Bill—that they do not think it is necessary. It is now passing through this House. It is perfectly legitimate and I shall continue to ask those questions. I am asking the Government about the Statement that was made two or three weeks after the Second Reading of this Bill and one week before its Committee stage. I did not table any amendments until that statement, so it is relevant today.
Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Henley
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Friday, 5 March 2010.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
717 c1708 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 20:11:59 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_627119
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_627119
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_627119