UK Parliament / Open data

Bribery Bill [Lords]

Proceeding contribution from Jack Straw (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 3 March 2010. It occurred during Debate on bills on Bribery Bill [Lords].
I am grateful to the hon. and learned Gentleman for flagging up that point, which will need further consideration in Committee. My view is that because of the, I may say wholly unjustified, suspicion in some quarters about the role of Law Officers who are also Members of this House—as I believe very strongly they need to be for precisely the reasons of accountability that he raises—it is better to have the authority resting with the relevant directors. Those directors already have a duty to inform the Attorney-General, so it is not as though the Attorney-General would have to explain the matter blind. However, we will look into this issue. May I also point out that a refusal to institute proceedings is, these days, reviewable in the courts, which have, as in many other areas, accepted a jurisdiction in such cases?
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
506 c959 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top