I welcome the Bill and the speed with which the Government have introduced it. Nobody would want any Bill to have to pass all its stages in one day, and for the House to miss the opportunity of pre-legislative scrutiny, but I am wholly convinced that the serious risk of no effective provisions being in place for terrorist asset freezing following the Supreme Court decision and, significantly, following the Supreme Court's refusal to suspend that judgment, justifies the unusual action being taken by the Government today.
Opposition Members have made much about the Government somehow failing to heed the warning signs of legal action against the orders, but the High Court's quashing of the order in early 2008 was overturned later that year by the Court of Appeal.
Terrorist Asset-Freezing (Temporary Provisions) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Smith of Malvern
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 8 February 2010.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Terrorist Asset-Freezing (Temporary Provisions) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
505 c671 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 19:54:49 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_624649
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_624649
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_624649