I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Blaydon (Mr. Anderson) for a superb Third Reading speech; I am glad to have heard it at this point because it much encouraged me.
I shall try to respond to the points that must not remain on the record without a response being given and on which I have been asked questions.
I asked the hon. Member for Wealden (Charles Hendry) to provide the details of the companies that supported his view that an EPS set at the right level would encourage investment. I must tell him that the Scottish and Southern Energy Group has said that""even legislation which provides for an EPS to be introduced at a level to be decided later, could deter investment, because it increases political risk"."
RWE has said that""the threat of any introduction of an EPS would act as a strong deterrent for investment in new plant"."
I believe that he is unable to support his arguments and, thus, his case for an EPS.
Energy Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Joan Ruddock
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 24 February 2010.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Energy Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
506 c381 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 19:56:49 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_623513
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_623513
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_623513