My Lords, there is a further curiosity about paragraph (c) in that it is a defence only if the member of the Armed Forces is engaged in, ""an action or operation against an enemy … outside the British Islands … or the military occupation of a foreign country"."
So the basic concept is that we are dealing with the Army abroad.
However, it is a defence only to a relevant bribery offence that is defined as, ""an offence under section 1 which would not also be an offence under section 6"."
Under Clause 6, which refers to the bribery of foreign public officials, a member of the Armed Forces would not have this defence if he went along to the head of a village in Afghanistan, shall we say, who was holding a legislative, administrative or judicial position, or exercising a public function, and sought to bribe him.
Bribery Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Thomas of Gresford
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 13 January 2010.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Bribery Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
716 c108GC 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:21:51 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_608410
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_608410
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_608410