We should not. We started then from a very different situation, with massive over-manning in both the public and private sectors. Because of changes in the economy and in trade union law, that situation was seen to change. That happened in other countries that moved from a very socialised economy to a more liberal one, as a result of being too socialised and too syndicated in the first place—of having that mass over-manning. My point was that the contraction in the deficit produced an expansion in output of activity. That surely meant that there was less unemployment than there would otherwise have been, unless the Financial Secretary is saying that we should—well, I cannot see any alternative.
Pre-Budget Report
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Lilley
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 7 January 2010.
It occurred during Debate on Pre-Budget Report.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
503 c343 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-08 16:38:21 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_605249
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_605249
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_605249