UK Parliament / Open data

Health Bill [HL]

Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 9 November 2009. It occurred during Debate on bills on Health Bill [HL].
I am not arguing about that. I am arguing that the two-stage approach, which the Government originally favoured, was the proportionate one. If we are left with the McCartney amendment and nothing else, it will be a summary ban because it is an all-or-nothing position. That is my point. I maintain that, unless we ask the other place to think again, we will have on our hands a travesty of the parliamentary process. Without apology, I therefore beg to move. Division on Earl Howe’s Amendment Contents 82; Not-Contents 170. [See col. 638 for explanation of mistake in voting figures.] Earl Howe’s Amendment disagreed. Motion agreed. Amendment 12 Moved by
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
714 c621 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Back to top